Non-academic subjects and activities deserve more recognition for the cognitive skills

Gerald Graff and Mike Rose both argue that non-academic subjects and activities deserve more recognition for the cognitive skills that are required to be successful in those pursuits. However,there are a few differences in how they approach the subject. What are a few similarities and/or differences you see in each author’s essay? What evidence in the text supports your answer? Write a minimum of two paragraphs for this answer.

Order now