Also read:
- Historical Use of Play Therapy (support with peer-reviewed articles,ap
- Attached you will find a list of therapist who contributed to the field of play therapy. Choose one and complete part 1. Attached you will also a list of clients choose one and complete part 2. Attached is also a grading rubric. Part 1 What is your name? Where are you from? Describe your place in history and any important events that are occurring. Tell about your personal experiences that shaped your professional work. What kind of work do you do? What are your research interests? Tell about your theoretical approach, the role of play in your work, how it came to be, who influenced you the most, and what people will do in the future with your approach. Part 2 Continuing to write as the contributor, discuss the client case study. What are your goals in therapy in this case, and what kind of interventions would you use with the client to reach those goals? Provide a brief transcript of your third session with this client. What kind of ethical problems might you encounter and how would you handle them? Finally, give a prediction of how long your therapy might last with this client and how you might approach termination.
- Media's influence on body image- at least five articles from peer-reviewed journals, write one paragraph summarizing the main points of the articles
- Find two peer-reviewed articles that provide examples of quantitative studies relevant to your research topic.
- What experiences have you had with business training and support? The experiences may be as a giver or receiver of the service. What are the impacts of good training and support? What are the impacts of bad training and support? Why do you think bad training and bad support happen?
- Please discuss the follwoing passage and describe its historical significance (what does it teach us about the past?) and place it in the larger historical context (what larger historical event/movement is it part of ?).
- Peer-Reviewed Versus Popular Media
- Find and analyze opposing conclusions by citing research experts in at least four references from peer-reviewed scholarly journals.